How should charities and civil society respond to the cuts?

29 09 2010

Amount of loose change available to replace government funding may vary.

With the coalition’s cuts set to impact all areas of public spending, many civil society organisations, community groups and charities are growing increasingly concerned about the effect they will have on the people and causes they represent.

For all the rhetoric around the Big Society, the reality so far has proven rather different, with charities losing funding and many of the most vulnerable sections of society bearing the brunt of the cuts agenda.

Some charities have focused solely on defending their own area of funding, while others are looking to build a united front – and representatives of this latter group met in London last week to start initial discussions on how charities, community groups and civil society can build a united resistance to the cuts.

The meeting was off the record, so I’m not going to quote people or give a line by line account – save to say that it was productive and focused on strategy – but here are some of the suggestions and ideas that emerged during the meeting. As will be apparent, it covered a fairly wide range of topics.

Just to note, these aren’t necessarily my suggestions – just some of the points that were raised:

  • A key period will be between the finalising of the Labour cabinet on 30th September and the Spending Review on 20th October – the Labour leadership will be working out its approach to the cuts agenda during this time, making it the key three-week period when we (or those in Labour, at least) will have to try and exert maximum pressure on the leadership to take a solid anti-cuts line (etc). Labour will be stuck with whatever it says on Oct 20th until 2015, so it’s a crucial one-off chance to try and influence them as far as possible.
  • Tax avoidance was repeatedly raised as a key issue that needs to be highlighted, both on the fairness point and as a means of reducing the deficit without cutting services. Many organisations that have in the past focused on the impact of tax avoidance on poorer countries are acutely aware that it features heavily in the deficit debate here in Britain.
  • The C1C2 group of middle income voters is a very powerful block that isn’t being engaged properly – we need to identify set piece government cuts that affect C1C2s and mobilise that group (e.g. bus passes and winter fuel payments).
  • We in the anti-cuts movement have to be ready to suffer some defeats over the next year, as the government will be able to drive through much of its agenda through at first – so we will have to be able to maintain people’s confidence during these setbacks in order to win the long game. It’s important to find high-profile set piece ‘wins’ that can be achieved during this first year – specifically chosen fights with the government on big issues that we can win. However, we need to do so without pitting one campaign against another.
  • Local government could provide local campaigners with a chance to score early victories, albeit on individual cuts rather than the entire local government cuts programme. Scotland and Wales also provide opportunities for early breakthroughs, together with London in advance of the 2012 mayoral election.
  • Different sectors must avoid ‘nimby’ campaigning to protect their ‘bit’ by arguing that the government should cut some other sector instead – a form of cutthroat defence. There was a suggestion that different campaigners should enter into some kind of ‘non-aggression’ pact that would avoid different sectors competing against each other for funding. It might also be a way of working with those many charities and lobby groups that are wary of taking overtly political stances against the entire cuts agenda, but are protecting their own sector.
  • Developing that point further, it’s important that we try and spot in advance issues that could divide sections of the anti-cuts movement, and act early to reach some kind of accommodation to defuse any potential trouble. An obvious example would be possible tensions between certain environmental groups and industrial trade unions.
  • Since bailiffs coming to evict non-payers were a major focal point of anger at the poll tax, there was a suggestion of holding protests at county courts when there are eviction hearings of people forced out of their homes due to housing benefit cuts.
  • Co-operation between campaign groups may work best on the basis of mutual support rather than a formal coalition. Trying to get all the member organisations of a formal coalition to agree to joint statements can prove more hassle than it’s worth.
  • Legal challenges to elements of the cuts agenda (judicial reviews etc) could be an important tool. Austerity programmes rely on making a lot of headway in the first year or two – if the austerity programme gets bogged down in the first couple of years, people start losing patience and the programme is in trouble. Judicial reviews and other forms of legal challenges could help put a spanner in the works, and drag things out. Unison have clearly adopted this approach with regards to Andrew Lansley’s NHS White Paper.

I’d be interested to hear readers’ thoughts on those points and others. There’ll be more on this civil society initiative as it progresses.

P.S: Apologies for the rather sporadic updates of late – I’ve been very busy compiling some large Freedom of Information requests. More on those when they come through. Updates will continue to be sporadic until early-mid October.

Advertisements

Actions

Information

8 responses

2 10 2010
idle pen pusher

What happens when money lenders decide they don’t think giving the government £150bn a year is a sensible investment? Do you wait until there’s a crisis of confidence and the government simply can’t pay its bills or do you cut before then?

28 10 2010
Captain SKA

Ahoy

A little ditty written about the cuts.

Happy sailing

Captain SKA

8 11 2010
Casdok

Who is going to listen?

30 12 2010
John Green

It is far too late to whinge about cuts to services. You should have been protesting when Brown/Blair et al were devouring the seed corn.

We are now in the brown stuff up to our necks and many of us can’t swim! There is not one single voice from the left of politics with any constructive ideas on solving the nation’s problems.

1 02 2011
Robert

You take it out of welfare, nobody these days gives a shit about the sick the disabled the poor, my last labour leaflet stated hard working families, my Unions leaflet a few months ago stated hard working families, I have just told my grandson who wants to join the army lad if your injured you will become the New labour liability, a nobody a piece of shit the scum of the world, otherwise know to new labour work shy.

6 04 2011
Chochoooo

Maybe charities should stick to voluntary donations?

The last point was very telling about the attitudes of these people, legal action.

Now I have just cancelled my monthly donations to a particular charity (not impressed with some of their decisions lately), should they now have the right to take me to court?

I don’t see this as a moral action.

*For all the rhetoric around the Big Society, the reality so far has proven rather different, with charities losing funding*

You may disagree with it, but that is kind of the point of the big society.

Put your hand in your pocket and fund the charities yourself, don’t tell me that people can’t afford to, just go to any supermarket or town center any day of any week and see what people CAN afford to buy.

If they choose not to, then maybe we should be asking why instead of just bashing the rich?

*You take it out of welfare, nobody these days gives a shit about the sick the disabled the poor*

People do care about the disabled and sick.

But then we have the bad back brigade that ruin it for everyone else and give them a bad name.

*Since bailiffs coming to evict non-payers were a major focal point of anger at the poll tax, there was a suggestion of holding protests at county courts when there are eviction hearings of people forced out of their homes due to housing benefit cuts. *

Housing benefit needs to be cut, drastically.

I live in a 2 bedroom flat on a main road, the second bedroom being a big cupboard.

Someone I know who chooses to live on benifits gets a free council flat with 2 bedrooms the size of my living room, a storage cupboard the size of my bedroom, in a nice quiet location.

She has also been told that she will be put on the list for a house.

That anyone can defend such a situation sickens me.

24 06 2011
Rotten Council

Tax avoidance is certainly an area that can be addressed but in order to do this, a level playing field must be adopted which includes encompassing tax avoidance schemes used by many elected officials in government.

20 09 2011
Peter Benson

We should respond with any and all means at our disposal.Protest on the Streets.Protest online.Comment on Blogs.Sit on the doorsteps of those to be evicted blocking the bailiffs.

We need to make the Government know we are here to stay.Anger them,annoy them,badger them.Get it in the press.Make folk sick and tired of it.

Badger their consciences about those evicted,homeless,jobless,sick but deemed fit by a uncaring government.Keep it in their face.Never let up.Never give up.

Fight them in the courts.Appeal Decisions.Block up the system till the B——S find its costing to much.Never give in.Never let them Win.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: